Good News For Who

Good news is it? So Brookes thinks it is good news that Sue Tyers has withdrawn her application does he, but good news for who I wonder. Lets not forget Brookes, Sue Tyers put in a lot of good service to this town and she did it for the good of the town. She doesn't have a criminal record, unlike you, she didn't post pornographic pictures after criminally breaking into the Oakham Town Council's noticeboard, unlike you, she has never sued the church for thousands of pounds, unlike you, she has always worked to earn a living, unlike you, she has never posted unwarranted and defamatory blogs, unlike you, and quite frankly she is a far, far better person than you could ever hope to be. At least Sue has the integrity required to be a councillor, UNLIKE YOU!!!!!!

CRB Check This Councillor

How can it be right that an Oakham Town Councillor puts on display pornographic images in an official Oakham Town Council notice board, is subsequently arrested and is then seen taking photographs at Royce Playing fields where there are children present when the new equipment was officially opened. Should a man who obviously has a penchant for displaying pornographic images on a public notice board be allowed anywhere near children? I THINK NOT! As a councillor he may be visiting other establishments where there are children present AND THAT CANNOT BE RIGHT. Perhaps he ought to undergo a CRB check before being allowed anywhere near children again. He certainly needs to be watched very closely.